G2’s summer report just dropped and, well, we killed it. Webexpenses is ranked #1 overall for expense management, picking up 42 badges across the UK, ANZ (Australia/New Zealand), and EMEA, including #1 in both the UK enterprise and UK mid-market grids.
It goes without saying: Every ranking here is determined by verified reviews from real users. Your peers have spoken. And the safe choice in expense management is not what it used to be.
What the Summer 2026 results show
Every quarter, the software reviews platform G2 publishes software rankings based on aggregated user reviews, satisfaction scores, and market presence data.
For Summer 2026, we came out top across the overall expense management software category, and ranked first in two grids that matter enormously to us: UK enterprise expense management and UK mid-market expense management.
42 badges. #1 overall. #1 in enterprise. #1 in mid-market. That is not a claim we are making about ourselves. It is what the data says. If you’re evaluating expense management software providers right now, then do with that what you will.
The safe choice isn’t what it used to be
When bigger companies go looking for enterprise expense management software, many of them end up in the same place by default: SAP Concur or some other big hitter.
We get it. But many companies pick a software like SAP Concur despite it not being the best fit for them. It’s the recognised name and the assumed safe choice. Procurement teams lean on what’s familiar, and the decision gets made on brand recognition rather than actual performance.
That’s changing. Look at the enterprise rankings. We sit far to the right on the satisfaction axis. Our user satisfaction scores are, by some distance, the highest in the market.
Yeah, the gap in market presence is still there. But it largely reflects history and marketing budget rather than performance. User satisfaction is the best bellwether for whether the product actually works for the people using it every day.
Our detailed comparison with SAP Concur sets out it out quite plainly. On pricing, ease of use, support responsiveness and implementation speed, we consistently come out ahead in user reviews.
The evidence is coming from users – from finance teams, operations managers and FDs who have used both. If your peers are consistently rating us above the incumbent options, that is worth paying attention to.
Why the biggest name isn’t the top-rated one
The mid-market grid tells a similar story, and one that’s particularly relevant if you’re a growing UK organisation that has started to feel like your current expense software is either too bloated or not quite enough.
At this level, you need proper multi-entity support, policy controls, integrations with payroll and finance systems, and real reporting. But you also need a platform that is quick to implement and easy to use day-to-day.
Historically, mid-market companies have been caught between enterprise platforms that are too complex and too expensive, and lighter tools that do not have the depth.
We’ve been focused on that gap deliberately. Ranking #1 in the UK mid-market grid is a signal that what we are building is landing with the right people.
A product that is moving fast
Our platform is genuinely accelerating. Our public product roadmap sets out exactly what we’re building and when – because we think you should be able to hold us accountable to it.
We’ve just launched multi-entity expense management, which means organisations operating across multiple subsidiaries or legal entities can manage expenses with proper entity-level separation (without the spreadsheet chaos that usually goes with it).
You can read more about how we approach multi-entity expense management here.
Multi-currency support is on the way. This will be a big one for UK businesses operating internationally or managing spend across borders.
And on Webexpenses Cards: you get unlimited cashback on every transaction. No cap. For finance teams thinking about card programmes, that is a real, concrete benefit that compounds over time. If your spend is high enough, you can actually end up making money by using us.
The roadmap also includes a full reporting overhaul, real-time analytics dashboards, VAT reclaim analytics, auto category selection powered by AI, and a rebuilt mobile app. These are not aspirational features. They are either already shipping, in build or on the horizon.
We published our roadmap publicly because that kind of transparency is rare in this industry (and we think it should be the norm).
What Webexpenses actually does, and why you would choose us
Expense management is the core of what we do. Employees submit expenses via mobile or desktop, receipts are captured and auto-matched using OCR, and claims route through your approval workflow automatically.
Your policy rules are enforced at the point of submission. Non-compliant claims get flagged before they even reach a manager’s inbox, not after. That alone saves finance teams significant time on back-and-forth.
Webexpenses Cards give you a corporate card programme with real-time spend controls, automatic reconciliation against claims, and unlimited cashback. Cards are issued and managed through the same platform as your expense management, so there is no reconciliation gap between card spend and reimbursable expenses.
What ties it together is the experience of using it. The mobile app is fast. The admin interface is clean. Implementation is typically measured in weeks, not months. And if you need support, you can reach a real person based in the UK or Australia. Not a chatbot, not a ticket queue with a 48-hour SLA.
See it for yourself
G2’s Summer 2026 rankings reflect what verified users actually think of the software they use every day. We did not ask to be ranked #1. The reviews got us here (and we couldn’t be more proud).
This isn’t just a UK story. The same pattern is showing up across ANZ and EMEA — and the same gap between user satisfaction and market presence exists there too.
If you’re currently on SAP Concur, or if you are evaluating options and gravitating toward the biggest brand name in your region, we’d ask you to look at what your peers are saying first. Not what we say about ourselves, what they say about us.
The gap between user satisfaction and market presence in the enterprise and mid-market grids won’t stay where it is. More companies are making decisions based on evidence rather than assumption. And that gap closes every time they do.
