At a glance
Contents
Every supplier invoice asks you to agree to three things: you ordered it, you received it, and the price is right. Invoice matching is how you check all three before the money goes.
Skip the check and the problems are predictable. You pay for goods that never arrived. You pay last year’s price, or a price nobody agreed. You pay the same invoice twice because it came in once by email and once by post. And now and then, you pay a fraudster who sent a convincing invoice for something you never ordered.
Matching isn’t complicated. Doing it consistently, at volume, with half the information in someone else’s inbox, is the hard part.
| Type | Compares | Catches | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| No match | Invoice and approver judgement | Very little on its own | Utilities, rent, subscriptions |
| Two-way | Invoice and PO | Wrong price, wrong items, no PO | Services and fixed fees |
| Three-way | Invoice, PO and goods receipt | All of the above, plus goods not received or short deliveries | Physical goods and materials |
No match is fine for regular bills where a PO adds admin and no control, but it still needs an approver who knows what the bill should be. Two-way suits services, where there’s no delivery to confirm. Three-way is the standard for physical goods, because it’s the only one that proves the goods arrived. Some businesses add a fourth check, inspection, for goods that need testing. For most finance teams, three-way is the ceiling.
How you match depends on what kind of PO you raised.
An itemised PO lists each line: product, quantity, unit price. Matching happens line by line, and it handles real life well:
A blanket PO commits a value with a supplier over a period, without listing every item: cleaning at £1,500 a month for a year, or stationery up to £5,000 a quarter. Invoices are matched against the supplier, the category and the balance left. Blanket POs save a lot of admin, but they need watching:
Insist on an exact match and every penny of rounding becomes an exception. Allow too much and you’ve stopped checking. Tolerances set the line.
Most invoices match. The ones that don’t take most of the time. The fix is rarely working harder in AP: it’s getting each exception to the person who can actually resolve it.
| Exception | Likely cause | Who fixes it | What to do |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price mismatch | Old price list, missed discount, supplier error | Buyer | Check the contract price, then credit note or PO update |
| Quantity mismatch | Short delivery or invoicing ahead | Receiver | Confirm what arrived; pay for that |
| No goods receipt | Goods arrived, nobody booked them in | Receiver | Book in, or chase the supplier |
| No PO | Bought outside the process | Budget holder | Retrospective approval, logged as an exception |
| Duplicate invoice | Same invoice sent twice, or resent with a new number | AP | Reject and tell the supplier |
| Partial delivery | Rest of the order still to come | AP | Pay what matches; keep the PO open |
| New bank details | Genuine change, or fraud | AP and supplier manager | Verify by phone on a known number before paying |
Keep the 3-way match exceptions cheat sheet to hand, and check new bank details against the supplier bank detail fraud checklist.
| Measure | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| First-time match rate | The share of invoices that match with no human touch. Your headline number |
| Exceptions by reason | Tells you where to fix the process |
| Time to resolve an exception | Shows whether routing works |
| Invoices paid late because of exceptions | The cost to supplier relationships and any late-payment charges |
| Duplicates caught | Proof the controls are working |
For a fuller picture of control from request to payment, try the Purchase-to-Payment Control Score, or read From purchase to payment.
With Webexpenses Accounts Payable, invoices are read to line level as they arrive, matched two- or three-way to the order and receipt, and exceptions go straight to the right person.
For the decision-maker
For the team doing the work
Platform
FRONT OFFICE
BACK OFFICE
Capabilities
EXPENSES
ACROSS THE PLATFORM
TRUST AND ROADMAP
By Role
By Industry
By Industry
Vendor Validation
Broader Audience